
I am a supporter of extending civil rights to the LGBTQ community including the right to marry. I am not one who banishes a person based on his or her sexual orientation.
I must say that I questioned the ECUSA's decision to ordain Bishop Gene Robinson, not because he is gay or openly gay, on the basis that he lived with his longtime partner without marriage. I realize that they were unable to marry, but it's no excuse. IMHO it should have been a sacrifice on the bishop's part for the sake of the Gospel. A heterosexual who is in a loving, long term relationship, co-habitating without marriage would not have been ordained. I just don't believe it would happen and I don't think it should.
I'm not going to leave the ECUSA because of it nor do I think any less of Bishop Robinson. Anyway, there are more important issues to think about and to act on.
1 comment:
Not surprising. I knew this one was coming.
I remember the big ruckus over Robinson. I too questioned the ordination, because I knew it would generate controversy, and the theological bases for supporting a bishop's living openly as a homosexual are not uniformly agreed upon.
They chose him, not because of his homosexuality, but because they thought that he would be a good bishop otherwise. And yet, sometimes it is important to be prudent, with such a delicate political matter.
It should be interesting to see what happens with other churches and dioceses. I predict they will get some folks from Northern Virginia, that is, if a few of the parishes have not joined yet...
Post a Comment